IAASB proposes revisions to review engagements standard

The board opened a consultation on the proposed amendments, which include enhanced requirements for going concern disclosures.

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) released an exposure draft that proposes revisions to International Standard on Review Engagements (ISRE) 2410, Review of Interim Financial Information by the Independent Auditor of the Entity’s Annual Financial Statements.

The exposure draft’s key proposals include a clearer articulation of what an interim review engagement is and how it differs from a financial statement audit, a news release said. Other proposed revisions include enhanced requirements in areas of high public interest, such as going concern, fraud, and noncompliance with laws and regulations.

The proposed revisions, according to the release, represent the first comprehensive review of the standard since its issuance in 2005, reflecting the changes in the global environment and improvements to the audit and assurance model made over the last two decades.

“Interim financial information, such as quarterly and semi-annual reporting, plays an important role for investors,” IAASB Chair Tom Seidenstein said in the release. “These proposals seek to reinforce confidence in interim review engagements by clarifying expectations, strengthening consistency in practice, and improving communication to users.”

Investors and other users are expected to benefit from improved transparency in the auditor’s interim review report. Additional enhancements, the release said, include requirements related to engagement-level quality management, determining materiality for planning and performing an engagement, and group interim review engagements.

Comments are requested by 3 September.

— To comment on this article or to suggest an idea for another article, contact Steph Brown at Stephanie.Brown@aicpa-cima.com.

Up Next

Organisational design, not skills, limits AI adoption

By Steph Brown
June 4, 2026
A new global report finds that organisational design might be limiting the potential of AI tools more than skills gaps.
Advertisement

LATEST STORIES

How to determine what you’re worth

People power keeps productivity growing with AI

4 steps for businesses to establish an AI governance policy

Organisational design, not skills, limits AI adoption

Optimism mixed among US finance leaders

Advertisement
Read the latest FM digital edition, exclusively for CIMA members and AICPA members who hold the CGMA designation.
Advertisement

Related Articles