FRC guidance on recognising value of flexible governance reporting

The guidance aims to help investors and other users of corporate reporting recognise “well-reasoned explanations” for departing from provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code.

Updated guidance from the UK Financial Reporting Council (FRC) on its corporate governance code is designed to help investors, proxy advisers, and other users of corporate reporting understand and appreciate the value of companies that choose to depart from the code.

The FRC said in a news release Monday that a thoughtful, well-reasoned explanation for departing from provisions of its UK Corporate Governance Code does not constitute a governance failure. The updated guidance is intended to help investors and advisers understand what to look for when reading a departure explanation and why a departure can be seen as an indicator of a board taking its governance responsibilities seriously, the release said.

“A well-reasoned explanation for departing from a provision is not a red flag — it is evidence of a board thinking seriously about what good governance means for their company,” FRC CEO Richard Moriarty said in the release. “The UK Corporate Governance Code is a global standard precisely because it offers companies the flexibility to govern in a way that suits their circumstances.”

The FRC’s guidance, according to the release, “acknowledges that a culture has developed across the community including both issuers and investors and their advisers that considers departures from the code suspiciously”.

A thoughtful departure, when explained clearly, is “frequently evidence of a more considered and sophisticated approach to governance than simple box-ticking”, the FRC said.

— To comment on this article or to suggest an idea for another article, contact Steph Brown at Stephanie.Brown@aicpa-cima.com.

Up Next

Are finance leaders moving too fast on agentic AI?

By Bryan Strickland
July 22, 2026
While most senior finance leaders in a recent survey say they’re under career pressure to demonstrate a return on agentic AI investment, the ROI may be slowed by an emphasis on speed.
Advertisement

LATEST STORIES

Part 1: Manus AI and the emergence of autonomous agents

Are finance leaders moving too fast on agentic AI?

CIMA calls for skills and tax reset by UK government

IASB opens consultation on proposed taxonomy update

5 mistakes companies make on AI policy

Advertisement
Read the latest FM digital edition, exclusively for CIMA members and AICPA members who hold the CGMA designation.
Advertisement

Related Articles