Internal auditors’ job satisfaction higher with incentive pay, survey finds

Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2014. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.

Internal auditors who receive incentives based on profits or revenue report higher job satisfaction and loyalty to their organisations without having their objectivity compromised, according to a new survey report.

Amongst the 1,600 internal auditors who responded to the survey conducted in North America, about 50% of chief audit executives, 56% of directors of internal audit, 48% of audit managers, and 39% of audit staff receive profit- or revenue-based bonuses.

On a scale of 1 to 5, those who receive profit- or revenue-based incentives rated their job satisfaction at 3.94, compared with 3.85 for those who do not receive incentives.

Internal auditors who receive incentives also reported higher levels of identification with their organisation (3.79 vs. 3.61) and lower levels of conflict between their organisations’ work standards/procedures and their ability to act according to professional judgement (2.28 vs. 2.39).

The survey results did not show that auditors’ objectivity is impaired when their incentives are tied to profits, according to the survey report by Venkataraman Iyer, CPA, Ph.D., an accounting professor at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
 
Auditors who receive profit-based compensation actually showed a higher propensity to suggest a write-down and higher estimates of inventory obsolescence in a hypothetical case study presented in the survey. These results ran opposite to the idea that auditors’ judgement may be impaired if they receive profit-based incentives.

The report, Job Satisfaction for Internal Auditors: How to Retain Top Talent, was published by The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation. Other findings include:

  • Lower-ranking internal audit staff members have lower levels of identification with their employers and their profession.
  • One-tenth of respondents indicated a sense of conflict between organisational procedures and their professional judgement as internal auditors.
  • About 72% of respondents disagreed or disagreed strongly that there was a conflict between work standards and their ability to use professional judgement. Lower-ranking, staff-level respondents reported higher levels of conflict between their organisations’ work standards/procedures and their ability to act according to professional judgement.
  • Chief audit executives who report to the audit committee perceive less organisational/professional conflict than those who report to management. This supports the idea that reporting to the audit committee enhances auditors’ independence, according to the report.

Ken Tysiac (ktysiac@aicpa.org) is a CGMA Magazine editorial director.

Up Next

Innovation drives investor confidence in Asia

By Steph Brown
April 30, 2026
Optimism for foreign direct investment in emerging markets modestly improved year over year. Asia stands supreme on the list of top-ranked markets for investment for the first time in over a decade.
Advertisement

LATEST STORIES

What to do when a rival tries to poach you

Innovation drives investor confidence in Asia

IPSASB looks to augment financial statement presentation

How are finance teams really using AI and automation?

Future‑ready finance leader: From preparation to performance

Advertisement
Read the latest FM digital edition, exclusively for CIMA members and AICPA members who hold the CGMA designation.
Advertisement

Related Articles

The first IBM Quantum System Two in Europe, located at the IBM-Euskadi Quantum Computational Center in San Sebastián, Spain, was unveiled on 14 October 2025.