US FASB proposes updated standard for insurance contracts

Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2013. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.

In an effort to improve guidance, the US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) on Thursday proposed an updated standard for the financial reporting of all insurance contracts, not just those written by insurance companies, and asked stakeholders to comment on it by October 25th.

The proposal aims to bring consistency to the existing standards under US generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), including measurement of insurance liabilities and the related effect on the statement of comprehensive income. Existing GAAP standards evolved over the years in response to the introduction of new products, which led to inconsistencies.

FASB’s proposed standard is the result of a joint insurance contracts project with the International Accounting Standards Board, which last week released a revised exposure draft of proposals meant to improve accounting for insurance contracts. The long-term goal of the joint project is to work toward a converged international standard.

“The proposed standard is intended to bring greater consistency and relevance to the accounting for contracts that transfer significant risk between parties,” FASB Chairman Leslie Seidman said in a statement.

The proposal includes significant changes. Among other things, it would:

  • Require contracts that transfer significant insurance risk to be accounted for as insurance, regardless of the type of institution that issued the contract. Therefore, the proposed standard would apply to banks, guarantors, service providers and other types of insurers, in addition to insurance companies.
  • Establish the principles that an insurer would apply in the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of insurance contracts issued and reinsurance contracts held in its financial statements.
  • Limit the number of measurement models to two. The building block approach would be applied to most life, annuity and long-term health contracts. The premium allocation approach would be applied to most property, liability and short-term health contracts, and some guarantees and service contracts.

Sabine Vollmer (svollmer@aicpa.org) is a CGMA Magazine senior editor.

 

Up Next

AI readiness, skills gaps top concerns of finance leaders

By Steph Brown
December 17, 2025
Eighty-eight per cent of finance professionals believe AI will be the most transformative tech trend over the next 12 to 24 months. Yet only 8% feel their organisations are “very well prepared” to manage it, a new AICPA and CIMA survey shows.
Advertisement

LATEST STORIES

Finance and cyber resilience

5 elements of an effective AI prompt

AI readiness, skills gaps top concerns of finance leaders

Expert advice for navigating challenges, changes, self-doubt

Legislation set to lower EU sustainability reporting threshold

Advertisement
Read the latest FM digital edition, exclusively for CIMA members and AICPA members who hold the CGMA designation.
Advertisement

Related Articles