How can internal audit collaborate and still maintain independence?

Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2013. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.

Collaboration can be a difficult objective for internal auditors to fulfil. Many of their duties require independence and separation from the business units and functions they are required to review.

But demand for internal auditors to serve as strategic advisers is expected to grow, according to a recent EY report. And internal audit teams are expected to co-ordinate with a wide range of groups in organisations, although there are times when internal audit must be detached from strategic decision-making, according to a recent Internal Auditing Around the World report by global consulting firm Protiviti.

So while collaborating is seen as a necessity for internal audit, it’s not always easy – and not just because some internal auditors aren’t used to co-ordinating their activities with other groups. Collaboration is a two-way street, and organisational groups from the board level down need to adjust and include internal audit in their activities where appropriate, the Protiviti report says.

Business executives explain in the Protiviti report how working through the challenges to collaboration with internal audit has been worthwhile to their companies:

  • At French software designer Dassault Systèmes, corporate audit director Etienne Grobon said a collaborative approach gives him more visibility into key risks because people know him and trust him.
  • George Dooley, Visa’s chief audit executive, said collaboration helps his team move quickly.
  • Collaboration has helped US-based food producer and distributor General Mills become more efficient and eliminate duplication of work, according to global internal audit vice president Cathy Harris.

Enabling such collaboration while maintaining objectivity and independence, the report says, will help internal audit teams bring more value to businesses.

Ken Tysiac (ktysiac@aicpa.org) is a CGMA Magazine senior editor.

 

Up Next

AI errors and poor data quality fuel investor scrutiny

By Steph Brown
August 17, 2026
Most investors in a new survey cite concerns about AI accuracy in company disclosures, and more than one in four executives report that AI errors have been detected in information that reached external audiences or company boards.
Advertisement

LATEST STORIES

Irreplaceable attributes in an AI world — Q&A with the CIMA president

AI errors and poor data quality fuel investor scrutiny

Data breach costs climb as AI-powered attacks surge

Steps to strengthen your company’s corporate culture

UK hiring measure hits neutral level for first time since 2022

Advertisement
Read the latest FM digital edition, exclusively for CIMA members and AICPA members who hold the CGMA designation.
Advertisement

Related Articles