UK public sector organisations often fail to measure productivity

New research from AICPA & CIMA finds that private sector finance professionals are more likely to track their organisations’ productivity than those in the public sector.

New UK research from AICPA & CIMA, together as the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants, found that accounting and finance professionals in the private sector are more likely to be measuring productivity than peers in the public sector.

“Management accountants in the private sector are much more likely to focus on making productivity improvements,” a news release said, detailing that 53% of public sector workers say their organisation does not track productivity, compared with 26% in the private sector.

The report, Improving Public Sector Productivity, said the public sector would benefit from “centralising the responsibility” for tracking productivity.

“The private sector relies on finance professionals to measure productivity, whereas in the public sector, this responsibility could be spread across multiple functions with little clarity of the role,” the report said.

A comparative analysis was conducted on data from 444 responses received in an online survey distributed to CIMA members in the UK in private and public sectors. One example of the stark differences between the measurement of productivity: 39% of respondents from the private sector said their organisation tracks revenue per employee while only 4% of respondents from the public sector said that was the case.

Andrew Harding, FCMA, CGMA, chief executive—Management Accounting at AICPA & CIMA, said in the news release that the outcome of the survey report “fuels doubts about the long-term sustainability of our public service provision and value being delivered to taxpayers”.

Harding also said: “Implementing better measurement and tracking of outcomes, both quantitative and qualitative, would help drive more effective decision making, resource allocation, and performance. These are critical elements as public services are being financially squeezed whilst more [is] being asked of them.”

The report makes several recommendations, including an emphasis on staff training. “Investment and focus on people and skills is as important as investment in technology to improving productivity,” the report said.

— To comment on this article or to suggest an idea for another article, contact Steph Brown at Stephanie.Brown@aicpa-cima.com.

Up Next

AI readiness, skills gaps top concerns of finance leaders

By Steph Brown
December 17, 2025
Eighty-eight per cent of finance professionals believe AI will be the most transformative tech trend over the next 12 to 24 months. Yet only 8% feel their organisations are “very well prepared” to manage it, a new AICPA and CIMA survey shows.
Advertisement

LATEST STORIES

Finance and cyber resilience

5 elements of an effective AI prompt

AI readiness, skills gaps top concerns of finance leaders

Expert advice for navigating challenges, changes, self-doubt

Legislation set to lower EU sustainability reporting threshold

Advertisement
Read the latest FM digital edition, exclusively for CIMA members and AICPA members who hold the CGMA designation.
Advertisement

Related Articles