UK regulator lists 10 areas for reporting improvement

The Financial Reporting Council said it will focus on companies’ reporting against new climate-related requirements in 2022.

Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2021. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.

Cash flow management in an uncertain world

In its Annual Review of Corporate Reporting 2020–21 the FRC identified ten areas where improvements to reporting are required. These include reporting on judgements and estimates, revenue, and cash flow statements.

The FRC’s executive director of supervision, Sarah Rapson, said the regulator “continued to identify basic errors in cash flow statements that should have been identified by companies’ own internal review processes”.

The FRC also published its end-of-year bulletin of key matters for preparers, which sets out the regulator’s focus for the coming year.

From next year, premium listed companies, which are subject to more stringent governance requirements, will be required to disclose their compliance with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations on a comply-or-explain basis, the FRC said.

The regulator said it also expects material climate change policies, risks, and uncertainties to be included in narrative reporting and appropriately considered and reflected in the financial statements.

Rapson said: “Given the growing importance of climate risks and the need for high-quality reporting in this area, the FRC will be closely reviewing how companies report against the new TCFD requirements.”

For its annual review, the FRC reviewed 246 reports and accounts, which was a 14% increase over 2020. It also wrote to 97 companies with substantive questions about their reports.

— Oliver Rowe (Oliver.Rowe@aicpa-cima.com) is an FM magazine senior editor.

Up Next

Digital monitoring of job performance linked to higher employee strain

By Steph Brown
November 4, 2026
Employees subject to algorithmic management reported higher job strain, with performance monitoring most strongly associated with poorer wellbeing outcomes.
Advertisement

LATEST STORIES

What it takes for a CFO to lead operations and tech

The why, what, and how of business jargon

Digital monitoring of job performance linked to higher employee strain

CGMA Week: Celebrating the power of community

Chancellor delivers UK Autumn Budget

Advertisement
Read the latest FM digital edition, exclusively for CIMA members and AICPA members who hold the CGMA designation.
Advertisement

Related Articles