IASB votes to propose delaying effective date of revenue standard

Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2015. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) voted Tuesday to propose a one-year delay in the effective date of the new, converged revenue recognition standard. The decision follows requests from financial statement preparers.

The proposal, which also would allow early adoption, keeps the IASB aligned with the US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), which voted April 1st to propose a similar delay. IASB members said that although international convergence is important, the needs of the IASB’s constituents were more important in their decision to propose a delay.

“Everybody underestimated how much work it takes to do these things [for implementation],” IASB member Gary Kabureck said during Tuesday’s board meeting.

Under the proposal, the effective date would be January 1st 2018. The IASB plans to publish an exposure draft that would invite public comment, and would finalise its discussions on the issue at its board meeting in July.

Feedback the IASB received from financial statement preparers, particularly those in the telecommunications and automotive industries, requested a delay. Reasons cited by preparers, board members, and IASB staff for proposing a delay included:

  • The original publication of the standard in May 2014 was delayed by several months.
  • The IASB is proposing amendments to the standard that will require further analysis and work in implementation if they are approved. (FASB also is proposing changes to the standard.)
  • The timing of the release of new IT software solutions may make it difficult for some companies to be ready to implement the new standard by the original effective date.

—Ken Tysiac (ktysiac@aicpa.org) is a CGMA Magazine editorial director.

Up Next

Digital monitoring of job performance linked to higher employee strain

By Steph Brown
November 4, 2026
Employees subject to algorithmic management reported higher job strain, with performance monitoring most strongly associated with poorer wellbeing outcomes.
Advertisement

LATEST STORIES

What it takes for a CFO to lead operations and tech

The why, what, and how of business jargon

Digital monitoring of job performance linked to higher employee strain

CGMA Week: Celebrating the power of community

Chancellor delivers UK Autumn Budget

Advertisement
Read the latest FM digital edition, exclusively for CIMA members and AICPA members who hold the CGMA designation.
Advertisement

Related Articles