US government moves to curb tax inversions

Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2014. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.

The US Treasury Department announced late Monday that it will take steps to curb corporate tax inversions, a growing tax minimisation strategy that has been the subject of many headlines recently.

In a prepared statement, Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew hailed the move as the first steps in making “substantial progress in constraining the creative techniques used to avoid US taxes, both in terms of meaningfully reducing the economic benefits of inversions after the fact, and when possible, stopping them altogether.”

In a corporate inversion, a multinational company based in the United States will replace its US parent with a foreign parent, thereby potentially avoiding US taxation on some or all of its profits. The actions Treasury announced on Monday are designed to reduce the tax benefits and therefore the incentives for inversions. Treasury’s actions will generally curtail the ability of the inverted company to access the foreign subsidiaries’ overseas earnings without paying US tax; however, the new rules will apply only to deals closed Monday or after.

The Treasury Department announced that it will take action in four specific areas:

First, it will act under Internal Revenue Code Sec. 956(e) to prevent the use of so-called hopscotch loans. Hopscotch loans involve repatriation of foreign earnings by having controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) make loans to their new foreign parent, instead of to the former US parent. In the future, such loans will be considered US property for purposes of the anti-avoidance rule.

Second, Treasury will act under Internal Revenue Code Sec. 7701(l) to prevent a decontrolling strategy in which the new foreign parent buys enough stock in the CFC to take control away from the former US parent, giving the foreign parent access to the deferred earnings of the foreign subsidiary without paying tax. Treasury will treat the new foreign parent, in this situation, as owning stock in the former US parent instead of the CFC.

Third, Treasury will act under Internal Revenue Code Sec. 304(b)(5)(B) to stop inverted companies from transferring cash or property from a CFC to the new foreign parent, avoiding US tax.

Finally, Treasury will act under Internal Revenue Code Sec. 7874 to strengthen the requirement that former owners of the US entity own less than 80% of the new combined entity. These steps will include limiting the ability of companies to count passive assets that would inflate the new foreign parent’s size; preventing US companies from making extraordinary dividends to reduce their pre-inversion size; and stopping “spinversions,” in which a US entity transfers assets to a new foreign entity that it spins off to its shareholders.

Alistair M. Nevius (anevius@aicpa.org) is CGMA Magazine’s editor-in-chief, tax.

Up Next

With greenhouse gas reporting, sizable gaps persist

By Bryan Strickland
September 5, 2025
Large companies in the UK are making progress as more sustainability reporting requirements approach, but they could face significant challenges when seeking assistance from smaller companies in their supply chain.
Advertisement

LATEST STORIES

With greenhouse gas reporting, sizable gaps persist

Accountability: Inescapable, challenging, and valuable

US business outlook brightens somewhat despite trade, inflation concerns

Elevating productivity through strategic business partnering

Mark Koziel Q&A: Talent, sense of community, profession opportunities

Advertisement
Read the latest FM digital edition, exclusively for CIMA members and AICPA members who hold the CGMA designation.
Advertisement

Related Articles

UK budget: National Insurance rate to increase for employers