UK FRC publishes guidelines for disciplinary sanctions

Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2013. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.

A new Financial Reporting Council (FRC) public document provides guidelines for FRC Disciplinary and Appeal tribunal members as they determine sanctions for FRC members or member firms that commit misconduct or fail to meet certain obligations.

The guidance for sanctions under paragraphs 9(8)(i) and 10(12)(i) of the Accountancy Scheme (the “Scheme”) and Accountancy Regulations, published Wednesday, was established to:

  • Promote proportionality, clarity, consistency and transparency in sanctions decisions.
  • Make all parties aware of the approach a tribunal is likely to take when determining sanctions.
  • Promote and maintain public confidence in the regulation of the accountancy profession.

The guidance is not binding on tribunals, but it says a tribunal that departs from the guidance should explain reasons for the departure. The guidance also is relevant for executive counsel and members of the FRC’s Case Management Committee when they perform their duties under the Scheme.

The FRC’s Conduct Committee issued the guidance, which takes effect immediately in areas where it is compatible with the Scheme. Where the guidance is not compatible with the Scheme, it will become effective upon amendment of the Scheme. The Scheme’s provisions will prevail in the event of a conflict with the guidance.

The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) participated in the consultation process and made suggestions – many of which were incorporated.

One objective of the guidance is to help tribunals impose sanctions that:

  • Improve the behaviour of the offending member or member firm.
  • Are tailored to the facts of a case.
  • Consider the nature of the misconduct and circumstances of the member or member firm.
  • Are proportionate to the nature of the misconduct and the harm or potential harm caused.
  • Eliminate financial gains or benefits resulting from misconduct.
  • Deter misconduct by the member, member firm and others.

Potential sanctions include exclusion from membership; withdrawal of a member or member firm’s practising certificate or licence; repayment of client fees; fines; and reprimands.

Ken Tysiac (ktysiac@aicpa.org) is a CGMA Magazine senior editor.

 

Up Next

AI readiness, skills gaps top concerns of finance leaders

By Steph Brown
December 17, 2025
Eighty-eight per cent of finance professionals believe AI will be the most transformative tech trend over the next 12 to 24 months. Yet only 8% feel their organisations are “very well prepared” to manage it, a new AICPA and CIMA survey shows.
Advertisement

LATEST STORIES

Finance and cyber resilience

5 elements of an effective AI prompt

AI readiness, skills gaps top concerns of finance leaders

Expert advice for navigating challenges, changes, self-doubt

Legislation set to lower EU sustainability reporting threshold

Advertisement
Read the latest FM digital edition, exclusively for CIMA members and AICPA members who hold the CGMA designation.
Advertisement

Related Articles