FASB, IASB to work on classification and measurement for financial instruments

Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2012. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.

The US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) are working together to reduce differences in their respective classification and measurement models for financial instruments.

The boards announced Friday that they will explore these models jointly, then decide whether to propose amendments to IFRS and US GAAP.

These discussions will take place as part of FASB’s ongoing reconsideration of a Proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) on financial instruments. The Proposed ASU, Accounting for Financial Instruments and Revisions to the Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—Financial Instruments (Topic 825) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), was originally issued in May 2010.

The IASB will take the discussions with FASB into consideration in its project to make limited changes to IFRS 9, Financial Instruments, which was issued in November 2009. The IASB’s project was amended in 2010 as a result of its ongoing work to develop a new IFRS on insurance contracts and feedback received on how IFRS 9 applies to particular instruments.

In a statement, FASB Chair Leslie Seidman said the boards are continuing to develop a common approach to impairment of financial assets, which is the subject of a separate project. FASB is proposing enhanced disclosures about interest rate risk and liquidity, which are covered by IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures.

“The boards have been urged to converge their standards on financial instruments,” Seidman said. “Today’s decision to work together on key differences—which represent the most significant remaining differences between the decisions reached to date—is responsive to stakeholders in the US and abroad.”

IASB Chairman Hans Hoogervorst said in a statement that IFRS 9 was introduced in 2009 with the idea that further amendments might be required when the direction on insurance contracts became clear. He said now is the time to consider those amendments.

Up Next

Through uncertainty, reflective leaders seen as more decisive

By Steph Brown
February 25, 2026
The ability to look inward was tied to increased confidence and focus for leading organisations through global disruptions, including AI, according to a McKinsey report.
Advertisement

LATEST STORIES

Through uncertainty, reflective leaders seen as more decisive

CIMA urges government to restore UK business confidence

Charities fear cyber fraud, but human risks still dominate

4 finance trends for 2026

3 named as CGMA Management Case Study Exam top scorers

Advertisement
Read the latest FM digital edition, exclusively for CIMA members and AICPA members who hold the CGMA designation.
Advertisement

Related Articles

4 finance trends for 2026